A BMX crew, a camera, and a wordmark I redrew about forty times. I was sixteen. Almost everything I do now started here, and none of it felt like work.
Kept Strange was a group of us who rode BMX and skated around Cheltenham. I was the one with the camera, so I ended up shooting everyone, and then I started drawing a logo for a thing that didn't really exist. There was no client, no brief and nobody asking for it.
What I didn't realise at the time is that I was building a brand pack. A wordmark, a mark, a set of rules for how they sat on a photograph, and a portrait treatment that held the whole crew together. It's the same object I now build for a brewery or a supper club, made ten years earlier with worse tools and more time.
This was the Year 12 project, called Personal Opinions, and it is the best photography on this page. One subject, a black ground, and a single light placed so that most of the face stays gone. I shot it over and over until the fall-off landed exactly where I wanted it.
The whole point is what you cannot see. There is no set, no context and nothing to read except the parts of a face the light happens to reach, which puts the entire weight of the picture on the person holding still and trusting you.
The other half of that year happened in empty places: a shut-down nursery with the polythene coming off the frames, a stripped office with the paperwork still on the desk, a corridor lit red by whatever was left plugged in. We were teenagers climbing through gaps in fences, and I brought a camera.
It taught me something the portraits could not. In a studio you add light until the picture works. In a derelict greenhouse in February you get exactly what is there, and the only decisions left are where to stand and when to press.
The A-level work went somewhere quieter. I got interested in what a window blind does to a face at four in the afternoon, and shot the same friend over and over until the light did the thing I wanted.
The useful part was learning to wait for a condition rather than arrange one. I had no lighting kit and no studio, so the only variables were the time of day, the room, and how long the person would put up with me.
A photograph on its own is hard to judge. A photograph inside the format it has to survive, a cover, a spread, a feed, tells you immediately whether it works. I still do this. The DEYA packshots get reviewed at full size against a fixed gate, for the same reason these got dropped into a magazine cover.
Twenty-two pages, called Portraiture. I shot it, designed it, wrote the copy and laid out every spread. The same friend is in most of it, because he was the one who kept saying yes.
The spread I would defend is the covers one. I took a single frame, put it on the front of Dazed again and again, and changed one thing each time to see which version still held at cover size. That is a review gate. I just did not have the words for it yet.
Nineteen pages, shot over about a year. Cars at night, the reservoir at sunset, someone's bedroom, the woods behind the school. It opens on a contact sheet of every frame, which I still think is the right way to start anything.
Every spread carries a note about why the picture is in there and what I would change. I was seventeen and marking my own work in the margin. That habit never went anywhere. It is the same reflex that puts an honest section at the bottom of everything else on this site.
Underneath the layouts, the photographs are just evenings. This is what most of the year actually looked like.
This one stopped me when I found it. A friend on a beach, built out of overlapping rectangular fragments with the edges left showing, so you can see the picture is assembled rather than taken.
In 2026 I spent weeks on a photographic joiner of a balcony view in Penang, and wrote it up as a technique I had taken from Hockney. I had already made one, in about 2016, from a holiday photograph. Some of the travel work on this page is Penang as well, which I also hadn't joined up until now.
None of this was a portfolio. It was a way of spending time with my friends and having a reason to be there. The photographs are good in places and ordinary in others, and the ordinary ones are still the ones I would keep, because they are the only record of who those people were at that age.
The work reads differently to me now. I was naming things, drawing marks, testing colourways, cutting frames together and putting pictures inside formats to see if they held. Nobody taught me any of that and no one asked for it.
Several of these survive only as social uploads, so they are small and have been compressed more than once. The originals are on a memory stick and some of them are gone. I have not upscaled or cleaned anything for this page: what is here is what is left.